|
|
Post by Todd Bykerk on Sept 13, 2014 18:21:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Dee Williams on Sept 14, 2014 7:44:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenneth Fenrup on Sept 14, 2014 15:13:57 GMT -5
I dont understand the WBAN ranking, with Cecilia as #2. A ranking should reflect who is the best fighter, and not who has the longest career. BoxRec have Cecilia as #1, with a big margin.
The next fight will probably be against Tori Nelson, sometime before christmas, and then Cecilia want to start boxing in light welterweight, she says, to pick up more belts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Todd Bykerk on Sept 14, 2014 17:38:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Dee Williams on Sept 15, 2014 2:09:20 GMT -5
I dont understand the WBAN ranking, with Cecilia as #2. A ranking should reflect who is the best fighter, and not who has the longest career. BoxRec have Cecilia as #1, with a big margin. Fair comment, and my gut feeling is that a rematch between #1 and #2 would reverse their order again in WBAN's computer ranking ... but the reason for the current order is (a) that Cecilia has fought a generally weaker schedule overall and (b) their head to head match is now three and a half years old so it no longer dictates their relative ranking in our system. BTW I do not think either computer ranking system (WBAN, Boxrec) always gives better results than the other relative to my own gut feeling. They do weight details of the boxer records differently which means there is often something to learn by looking at their differences. |
|
|
|
Post by Dee Williams on Sept 16, 2014 19:56:51 GMT -5
AFter looking into the details above I have widened the result retention window in the WBAN ranking program so the Hallback-Braekhus result again gets full weight in determining Braekhus's score. This change will apply to all fights and boxers as the program applies the same rules to everyone. Thanks for the feedback.
|
|
