|
Post by TD on Sept 17, 2012 11:27:13 GMT -5
Todd--the Hammer aint. She outweighed that lill girl by 10 pounds officially...likely 15+. Mathis KOs her just in 8...Hammer Braekus is a fight. Lamare is waiting for mathis for #3...I still say Lamare was robbed in #1.
My sense, fans are sick of fixed fights. They want reality to come back to boxing.
TD
|
|
|
Post by boxingjones on Sept 24, 2012 16:24:37 GMT -5
I would take Hammer over Mathis. She has a supreme sense of range and would keep Mathis just out of range while landing straight shots. Hammer is similar to Wladimir Klitschko in that you must get inside and force her to fight from that range to beat her. Perrozi had some success with that in thier matchup a few years ago.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Dennis on May 6, 2013 6:52:19 GMT -5
Mathis is 35 and has not had any fights apart from Holm (twice) and Braekhus in the last 18 months.
She deserves a big pay-day and, above all, a chance to get involved in a real brawl that she enjoys so much. It would be great to see her doing what she does best at least one more time, whoever the opponent might be.
|
|