Post by Esteban Erik Stipnieks on Mar 30, 2006 17:32:58 GMT -5
1)Why should Dunaway be forced to pay for her evidence that would obsolve her?
2)Why Should Ryan pay for a test the state should have done and the promoter should have done?
3)Why should we believe Dunaway if she has no credible evidence to back her up.
4)Why is the belt in anybody hands if rules of the sanctioning body were not followed? Why did Ryan also threaten retribution against what appears to be a legit protest.
5)Why is there the presumption of guilt on Hollie?
2)Why Should Ryan pay for a test the state should have done and the promoter should have done?
3)Why should we believe Dunaway if she has no credible evidence to back her up.
4)Why is the belt in anybody hands if rules of the sanctioning body were not followed? Why did Ryan also threaten retribution against what appears to be a legit protest.
5)Why is there the presumption of guilt on Hollie?